Quantcast
Channel: Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM(TM) GB4M(TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN(TM) GREATBOOKS4MEN(TM) lzozlzlzlzlzomglzozzl
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 111

Gamey Dalrockian Churchian “Economist” Scientists also Detest Nobel Laureate Economists F.A. Hayek and tehir Teacher Ludwig Von Mises, In Addition to Detesting Christ, Moses, Homer, Virgil, Jefferson, Einstein, NEwton, and Locke: F.A. Hayek saluted both Evolution and Genesis (which he saw as an evolutionary advantage)–the very same Law which Christ came to fulfill, which the chuchians detest:

$
0
0

One of the fatal mistakes the young fanboy churchian makes after he gets his cock wet by wearing a furry hat is to state that evolution and religion are opposites.  Rather, religion was, and is, part of evolution, if not evolution itself.  Because the gamey chruchian gave up on religion and science in favor of the pseudoscience of game, their families are dissolving and their women are buying little dogs instead of having their children., as Darwin’s natural selection runs its course. 

Because Dalrock et al. call Moses, Homer, Jesus, Socrates, Hayek, Mises, and teh GReat Books for Men “Buffoons,” they are reaping what they sow, as they fail to propagate in their furry hats and sectrive tapingz of butthetxtz zlzlzozooz.

Lyn87 “And for heaven’s sake, man, stop carrying water for GBFM – he’s a buffoon.”

In addition to detesting Jesus, Socrates, and Moses, as well as Einstein and Newton, the Gamey chruchian also detests Nobel Laureate economists such as F.A. Hayek, and their teachers Ludwig von Mises, whose motto in life came from Virgil (a silly stoopidz tstsopid great peoets books for menz zlzozo which GAME trumps because GAME IS SCI
ENCE and VIRGIL AND HOMER ARE SISSY UNSCIENTIFICZ POETSZ!).

http://mises.org/store/Misesorg-Liberty-Bracelet-P216.aspx

The lifetime motto of Ludwig von Mises, as taken from Virgil, “Tu ne cede malis,” or do not give in to evil (Virgil continues: “but proceed ever more boldly against it!”).

F.A. Hayek saluted both Evolution and Genesis (which he saw as an evolutionary advantage)–the very same Law which Christ came to fulfill, which the chuchians detest: “To understand our civilisation, one must appreciate that the extended order resulted not from human design or intention but spontaneously: it arose from unintentionally conforming to certain traditional and largely moral practices, many of which men tend to dislike, whose significance they usually fail to understand, whose validity they cannot prove, and which have nonetheless fairly rapidly spread by means of an evolutionary selection — the comparative increase of population and wealth — of those groups that happened to follow them. The unwitting, reluctant, even painful adoption of these practices kept these groups together, increased their access to valuable information of all sorts, and enabled them to be ‘fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it’ (Genesis 1:28). This process is perhaps the least appreciated facet of human evolution. –The Fatal Conceit : The Errors of Socialism (1988), p. 6″

One can see how the economist generally uses their charty goodness to conceal the true heart and soul of the issue:
“I have arrived at the conviction that the neglect by economists to discuss seriously what is really the crucial problem of our time is due to a certain timidity about soiling their hands by going from purely scientific questions into value questions. This is a belief deliberately maintained by the other side because if they admitted that the issue is not a scientific question, they would have to admit that their science is antiquated and that, in academic circles, it occupies the position of astrology and not one that has any justification for serious consideration in scientific discussion. It seems to me that socialists today can preserve their position in academic economics merely by the pretense that the differences are entirely moral questions about which science cannot decide.
Conversation at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. (9 February 1978); published in A Conversation with Friedrich A. Von Hayek: Science and Socialism (1979)”

Yes, Dalrock, the Great Books for Men are buffoons! Heed your frankfartian flock!  :)  Banish da greta bookz for menzZ!! !lzozozolz

 



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 111

Trending Articles