Eric2.4.14 / 3am
Eric2.4.14 / 3amDalrock and Vox are both a couple of dishonest pricks. More and more men are waking up and seeing them for the crackpots and charlatans they really are.
“Indeed women no longer follow God, Jesus, and Moses, but their butt and gina tinglez. And the hilarious thing is that rather than trying to resurrect the Christian Soul in the churches, schools, universities, and family court system and reform women, the “Christian men” such as Dalrock & Vox suggest that we all become slave to butt and gina tingelzozozizlzo and learn how to serve them first and foremost, over the teachings of Christ and Moses, as serving butt and gina tinzgzzlzlozolzoz over Christ and Moses is the heart and soul of game”
Brilliant!!!!!
A man has ever been defined by his ability to keep his word and match word and deed. The Heroic Achilles stated, “As i detest the doorways of death, so too do I detest that man who speaks forth one thing while hiding in his heart another,” and so one can see why the Churchians detest the GBFM, in addition to detesting Christ and Moses.
For Jesus teaches in Matthew, “
Matthew 5:37
New King James Version (NKJV)
37 But let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’ For whatever is more than these is from the evil one.”
Jesus teaches us first and foremost that words mean things. Jesus teaches us to respect the language and be very careful in choosing our words, and making sure we MEAN WHAT WE SAY.
Yes means yes, no means no, and game means game, ”For whatever is more than these is from the evil one.”
The center and circumference of Dalrock’s blog is teaching Churchians that they need “Game.” When one points out the obvious fact that Game (as defined by the general maosphere and by the honorable, truthful Heartiste who respects the language) is unChristian, Dalrock quickly states that his use of the word Game does not mean Game. nor does Dalrock’s yes mean yes, nor no mean no, for Dalrock is working for the dark one–the deconstructionist destroyer of words, the Word, and men’s souls.
Jesus teaches “In the beginning there was the Word and the Word was God.” Dalrock teaches that words, and thus God, have no intrinsic meaning beyond his own whimsical, tyrannical tingles, all to drive a few more readers his way, as he serves not Jesus nor the Word nor the Heroic spirit, but his own ego, which commands him to make his no mean yes, his yeas mean no, and Game to mean anything he wants it to mean, whenever he wishes, so as to confound and rule as an anti-man, anti-word, anti-Christian tyrant. While Dalrock deletes posts which quote Bible while encouraging his Marxist frankfurtian flock of childish churchians, the manosphere is growing wise to his wicked ways, and thus Dalrock turns his back on them, growing his cultish frankfurtian flock of deconstructionists and haters of words that mean things:
Eric2.5.14 / 3am
Uggh…I just read the ‘How Christians Can Take Credit for Game’ article again. I hadn’t noticed before that he also plagiarized the term “Roissyite’. (He used to get mad when anyone would use that ‘anti-Game slur’.)
What a doubly-deceitful prick he is… And a complete doofus too, because he tries to draw an analogy in this article allegedly proving the ‘truth’ of Biblical Game with ‘Grimm’s Fairy Tales.’
“So if you fear teaching Game to Christian husbands because Christians can’t take credit for the knowledge, rest easy. We can’t take credit for the Roissyites but we can and must take credit for creating the conditions allowing the Roissyites to thrive.”
Can there be any clearer admission that Game is a sexual-religious cult than this? Dalrock sounds like a cult leader who’s overthrown his Guru and taking credit for all his Master’s previous gains. And what’s even worse: after calling Roissy a ‘sinner’ he takes credit for encouraging that ‘sinful’ behavior–by purifying it!
Dalrock, Vox, Joseph of Jackson: these guys are all one step away from being outright cultists like the Moonies or Scientologists.
John1.1.14 / 12am
mwcain and the others constantly say “We can separate the meat from the bones” “We can take the bad from the good” I responded to his most recent post where he says we are all on the same path and we are arguing over details with:
“But the devil is in the details and that is how he has always worked starting with Eve. Sin doesn’t always come trumpets blazing with obvious hellfire, it comes as an extension or alteration of what is right.
Like St. Paul, he cannot get you to discard an action. But also like St. Paul said, he will challenge you on it, and that is not a sin. This is what GBFM is doing.
Mccwain you keep saying, we can separate bone and meat, the good from bad in one substance. Jesus always said if the yeast is bad, do not eat the bread. Do not mix wineskins and wine. If the fruit is bad the tree IS bad. He reiterated this point day in and out. Because Jesus gave us this tool to evaluate if something is pure, or of something is rotten, and it seems to me GBFM and several others are saying that game is indeed rotten.”
Jesus gave us a methods and tools for discerning what to follow and what not to follow. Look at the fruit of game, what did it lead to? Instead of putting out the sinful nature of woman and throwing away the rotten fruit, they choose to graft themselves to the rotten tree instead of Jesus.
If you read the Old Testament Israel was always invaded or in poverty when they turned away from him and the law of Moses, and whenever they followed the law, they flourished.
John1.1.14 / 12amI don’t know what Dalrock says about game and how it relates to a Bible-based marriage, but I do know what the Bible says about it – NOTHING. There is no room for game in a Bible-based marriage. The Bible quite clearly states the roles of the husband and the wife in marriage.
Consider the following from Ephesians 5:
22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
…28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
–
I didn’t see any mention of game in that passage. And let’s be quite clear about what game is – the manipulation of the female psyche in order to gain access to sexual behavior(hence the name “game”). If a man were to “game” himself (since he is commanded to love his wife as himself) he would be manipulating himself to gain access to something he values – like using game. But game has only manifested itself as a viable strategy because the dynamics of mate selection have been flipped on their head. That is the rub with game, it requires rationalizing a destructive social dynamic. Most “churchians” do not acknowledge this flipped script even though it is evident throughout the Bible:[b]1 Cor 14:[/b]
34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.
35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
[b]Titus 2:[/b]
1 But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine:
2 That the aged men be sober, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in charity, in patience.
3 The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;
4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
5 To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.
[b]Proverbs 12:4[/b]
A virtuous woman is a crown to her husband: but she that maketh ashamed is as rottenness in his bones.
[b]Proverbs 31[/b] (has A LOT to say about a wife’s behavior)
10 Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.
11 The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.
12 She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.
…
25 Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come.
26 She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness.
27 She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.
…
And the best line of all in the passage:
30 Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the Lord, she shall be praised.
—————————————————————————-
There are many more examples throughout the Bible that describe the role of the woman in a marriage and likewise for the husband:
[b]1 Timothy 3[/b]
2 Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach
Game is not a biblical concept. In the Bible it is quite clear that the woman is to be subservient to the man and the man to love his wife and treat her with mercy. This concept is taught in both testaments and is one of the first lessons learned after the fall:
[b]Genesis 3[/b]
16 To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.”
Trying to place game into a biblical context is like trying to place a geocentirc model of the solar system into modern astronomy. The authors of the Bible understood female nature and created the biblical model because it was the system that was best for their society. Unfortunately science has turned the idea of God into a relic of the past for most individuls in western society. Unfortunately, the wisdom regarding interpersonal behavior and social dynamics is still quite valid if one is interested in the amelioration of society.
Instead of quoting and honoring the Bible like the humble commenters, the arrogant Dalrock regularly writes posts exalting Game titled “Why Christians need game” and “How Christians can take credit for Game,” and then commands his flock to not discuss Game, as such conversations “derail the thread.” In other words, Dalrock’s “Game” means anything he wants it to mean, at any time–nothing more, and nothing less. His yes could mean no, his no could mean yes, and his game could be anything at any time, but one thing that doesn’t change is his love of deleting the words of Jesus and Moses. HE can change the meaning any time he wants, apparently depending on the tinzgzlzozoz or non tinzgzlzlzoz of his wife’s bunzgzgzhzozlzizolzzil or the tinzgzlzlzozozo of his ego locacted in his own. Dalrock the Humpty Dumpty chruchian tyrant:
“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty (Dalrocka tiny cockas little dicktator) said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”
So you can see Dalrofkckasz tiny Cockas’s unchristian, unmanly, deceptive, characterless quest for power and MAstery by any means necessary, which makes the bungzhzozlzizol of his frankfurtian flock tingle, as Dalrock’s favorite frankfartiananznz Boxer’s comments are let through, uncensored by Dalrocka tiny cocoaks little dicktator.
According to Dalrock, only his own words, and his own words alone, can keep the train on track, gliding along the rails Dalrock set up so as to ease Game into Jesus’s bunzghzozlzzizziuzlzozzllzoz.
Any attempts to keep Dalrocka’s “Game” out of JEsus’s bungzhozlzizol is seen as “derailing the thread.”
True Christian Women do Not Need to be Gamed: Dalrock & Vox’s Christianity is not the Christianity of Jesus Christ
A true Christian woman does not need to be gamed. A true Christian woman follows the Law of Moses which Jesus came not to abolish but to fulfill:
16 Unto the woman he said , I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bringforth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. -Genesis
Indeed women no longer follow God, Jesus, and Moses, but their butt and gina tinglez. And the hilarious thing is that rather than trying to resurrect the Christian Soul in the churches, schools, universities, and family court system and reform women, the “Christian men” such as Dalrock & Vox suggest that we all become slave to butt and gina tingelzozozizlzo and learn how to serve them first and foremost, over the teachings of Christ and Moses, as serving butt and gina tinzgzzlzlozolzoz over Christ and Moses is the heart and soul of game.
Dalrock & Vox’s “Christianity” is not the Christianity of Jesus Christ
A true Christian woman does not need to be gamed. A true Christian woman follows the Law of Moses which Jesus came not to abolish but to fulfill:
16 Unto the woman he said , I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bringforth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
Posted this at Dalrock’s blog, who placed my comments in limbo, as the words of Christ in the Sermon on the Mount are considered to be “too disruptive” on a Christian blog. lzozlzozozlzo. & dat is why like d da heartsites as heartises never cesors da words of jesus christ as heartsites does not fear them zlzolzoozzlzoz for his soul is pure
http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/losing-control-of-the-narrative/#comments
Interesting that this post should be titled “losing the narrative.”
Dalrock states that Christians need “Game,” and Vox writes, “I’m neither the first nor the only one to notice the intrinsic relationship between Biblical Christianity and the foundational concepts of Game: Women are fallen and women are inherently different than men. Being truth, Game is a subset of Christianity that happens to relate to an area of particular importance and interest to men.”
Vox states that Game is Truth and that it is a subset of Christianity. The most-respected, most-read, and most-profound blogger on Game is Heartiste. His “Sixteen Commandments of Poon” summarize Game:
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/
Heartiste makes no claims of being a Christian, but he may well be, as there are those who say they are not going, who go, just as there are those who say they are going, who do not go.
Dalrock and Vox are stating that the teachings of Heartiste are the same as those of Christ, who, by all accounts, defines Christianity. Dalrock and Vox are thus submitting that the Sermon on the Mount actually goes something like this:
The Beginning of the Sermon on the Mount
1 And seeing the multitudes, Dalrock went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciple Vox came unto him:
2 and he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying,
The Beatitudes
Lk. 6.20-23
3 ¶ Blessed are those who fuck her good: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 ¶ Blessed are they that ignore her beauty: for they shall be comforted. Is. 61.2
5 ¶ Blessed are the irrationally self-confident: for they shall inherit the earth. Ps. 37.11
6 ¶ Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after two women in the kitty: for they shall be filled. Is. 55.1, 2
7 ¶ Blessed are the ones who never say “i love you” first: for they shall obtain mercy.
8 ¶ Blessed are they that keep her guessing and never marry her: for they shall see God. Ps. 24.4, 5
9 ¶ Blessed are they that make her jealous: for they shall be called the children of God.
10 ¶ Blessed are they which are persecuted for too much boldness: 1 Pet. 3.14 for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 ¶ Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for Game’s sake. 1 Pet. 4.14
12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets 2 Chr. 36.16 · Acts 7.52 which were before you.
Folks–if we are to regain Christianity, will it come from men acting less Christain and perverting the teachings of Christ, or will it come from men following the true teachings of Christ over Game?
I leave you with the true teachings of Christ, and I fully understand that I may be censored/banned/persecuted for doing so:
The Beginning of the Sermon on the Mount
1 And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciples came unto him:
2 and he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying,
The Beatitudes
Lk. 6.20-23
3 ¶ Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 ¶ Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. Is. 61.2
5 ¶ Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Ps. 37.11
6 ¶ Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. Is. 55.1, 2
7 ¶ Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
8 ¶ Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. Ps. 24.4, 5
9 ¶ Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
10 ¶ Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: 1 Pet. 3.14 for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 ¶ Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 1 Pet. 4.14
12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets 2 Chr. 36.16 · Acts 7.52 which were before you.
The Salt of the Earth
13 ¶ Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savor, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. Mk. 9.50 · Lk. 14.34, 35
Jesus Christ Exalted the Law of Moses, not Dalrock / Vox Gamey Game. More Gamey Churchians Threaten to Ban and Censor the Words of Da GBGM for Quoting Jesus Christ and Honoring THE LAW OF MOSES Over Gamey Churchian Butt and Gina Tingalalozozzoozzo
Churchians have no shame and deserve every divorce/broken marriage they get. Their failed gamey crusade shall soon be forgotten, while the Christ and Moses they castigated, ignored, belittled, censored, and impugned shall Rise Again and Serve the Rising Generation who honors the Law of Moses and our Lord Jesus Christ over gamey game and gina tiznzgzlzlozozozo.
“Those who live by the tingzlzozozozozl shall die by the tingzlzlzozozlzoz” -GBFM
http://donalgraeme.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/thoughts-on-marriage-and-game/
donalgraeme writes, “IV. Conclusion
It cannot be denied that before the advent of Marriage 2.0, it wasn’t necessary for Christian men to have to Game their wives. Nor did they face an environment which was set up to ruin marriage as much as possible. Unfortunately, we do live in the Marriage 2.0 regime now, and Christian men must adapt to the times.”
Real Christian Men would Man Up and Exalt Christ and Moses, rather than Denying Their Teachings, just to serve tingzlzlzzo and kneel before a woman’s whims.
donalgraeme writes, “For some men, that means a decision on their part not to marry. For others, that means marrying and accepting the possibility that their wives may blow up their marriages at any time, and they have no means of recourse.”
my tender little lamb donalgreme, if a woman can blow up a marriage at any time, IT IS NOT A CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE! Which do Churchians hate more–the teachings of Christ and Moses or the Obovious?
And what about Great Men like Heartiste who Speak the Truth That Sets Us Free?
donalgraeme writes, “Those Christian men who take their chances in marriage must use whatever methods of maintaining control in their marriage are available, with Game being one of the few things still left in the toolbox. Should any of this be necessary? Of course not. But these are evil and desperate times, and desperate times call for desperate measures.”
my tender little lamb donalgreme, if you enter into a non-Christian marriage and then have to act in a non-Christian, gamey manner bowing down beofre a woman’s tingzlzozoz instead of honoring Our Lord Jesus Christ and the Law of Moses to maintain the un-Christian marriage, how exactly are your serving Christ? What about these Unholy acts makes one a Christian?
Now you people see why I mostly just go zlzlozoozlzzoozzo instead of reasoning with Christ-opposing Chruchians.
The sad thing is they destroyed the Glory of Christ and Desouled the Church all for a little bernankified nookiezizlzzizizzlozlzozozo.
Above donalgraeme writes, “Since GBFM loves to talk about the law of Moses, lets discuss it briefly.”
This is a remarkable and telling comment from a Churchian, who thinks that Moses is irrelevant to Christianity.
I pointed this out by showing how Jesus also loved to “talk about the law of Moses,” and was threatened with being banned and censored.
Our Lord Jesus Christ Honored The Law of Moses, which donalgraeme detesteth and scoffs at, considering only worthy of “brief discussion,” and only because GBFM brought it up. Well, long before da GBFM, our Lord Jesus Christ also brought it up–in these translations Jesus cites THE LAW OF MOSES directly:
Matthew 5:17 (CEV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
THE LAW OF MOSES
17 Don’t suppose that I came to do away with the Law and the Prophets. I did not come to do away with them, but to give them their full meaning.
Matthew 5:17 (ERV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus and the Old Testament Writings
17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy THE LAW OF MOSES or the teaching of the prophets. I have come not to destroy their teachings but to give full meaning to them.
Matthew 5:17 (GW) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside MOSES’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
Matthew 5:17 (GNT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Teaching about the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with THE LAW OF MOSES and the teachings of the prophets. I have not come to do away with them, but to make their teachings come true.
Matthew 5:17 (TLB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come—it isn’t to cancel THE LAWS OF MOSES and the warnings of the prophets. No, I came to fulfill them and to make them all come true.
Matthew 5:17 (NOG) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside MOSES’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
Matthew 5:17 (NCV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Importance of the Law
17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy THE LAW OF MOSES or the teaching of the prophets. I have not come to destroy them but to bring about what they said.
Matthew 5:17 (NLV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Teaches about the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with THE LAW OF MOSES or the writings of the early preachers. I have not come to do away with them but to complete them.
Matthew 5:17 (NLT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Teaching about the Law
17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish THE LAW OF MOSES or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.
Dear donalgraeme,
Go ahead and delete this. I am copying it and taking a screenshot of it, so that the world can know that you are A) bearing false witness against Jesus and Christianity and B) Censoring and deleting Jesus’s own words so that you can replace true Christinaity with your gamey version which denies the LAW OF MOSES which JESUS CAME TO FULFILL.
donalgraeme writes,
“If you are not willing to engage in a substantive debate over the merits of your post, or of mine, then I will delete your further comments.”
Nice ad hominem attack. Typical Churchian reaction to actually having to read the glorious words of OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST who exalts THE LAW OF MOSES but not your failed, decrepit CHURCHIAN GAME.
Go ahead, make my day. The Pharisees also censored, banned, and crucified Christ. Par for the Churchian course.
But the thing is, the Lord Jesus Christ will endure, no matter how many times you banish and condemn those who quote and Honor Him.
The world will little note nor long remember your violent transgressions against the spirit of Christmas, but it will yet celebrate JESUS and THE LAW OF MOSES for millenia to come.
Just because you, Dalrock, and Vox failed to honor JESUS by exalting the LAW OF MOSES, and thusly allowed GAME/TINGLELZOZOZOZ to rule your CHURCHIAN CHURCHES, don’t try to crucify Christ now and resurrect Him in your own Gamey image as a slave to tingzlzlzozlzizuzlzlzoz.
mdavid writes, ” Btw, could you please trim or limit GBFM’s comments so they don’t take up the whole thread? It’s hard to read others with all that copy/paste.”
There you have it folks. When one quotes the Lord Jesus Christ on a “Christian” blog, the Churchians rush to ban and censor them, and accuse them of blaspheming because they are quoting the Lord Jesus Christ.
Game on, worshippers of tinzgzlzlzozo and h8rs of the Word of Jesus Christ.
Donal Graeme bares false witness against da GBFM, libeling and slandering da GBFM.
Donal Graeme, “There is more, of course, but rather than simply quote the profane and often all but unreadable language of GBFM, I will translate some of his major arguments. ”
Firstoff, my language is entirely readable by tens of thousands who love da GBFM. Your inability to bask in the Glory and Love of God is not their problem.
Then, you accuse da GBFM of being profane.
All that I am doing is quoting the “profanity” of Game, as defined by the “Great Heartiste.”
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/
You will find da GBFM simply quoting the words there, and inserting them into the Sermon on the Mount, which Dalrock and Vox commandeth that we must do.
When it comes to GAME, the Great Heartiste is far and above far, far greater than all other gamey bloggers. The readership and respect of the Great Heartiste makes Vox/Dalrock look like fledging altar boys before the Pope of Game.
But one thing that the Great Heartiste does not do is conflate GAME with CHRISSTIANITY, as your idols DALROCK AND VOX DO.
For this reason, and others, HEARTISTE is a greater Christian, and has a better understanding of Christianity then you and your idols Dalrock and Vox.
Feel free to apologize for falsely castigating and impugning da GBFM and bearing false witness against Jesus and Moses, while libeling Christianity. For Jesus asks that we forgive those who repent, and shy away from sinning again in the future.
Is Donal Graeme a Moses-hater, Christ-hater, or both
Donal writes, “Since GBFM loves to talk about the law of Moses, let’s discuss it briefly. The law of Moses set up an impressive amount of social and legal controls over women. Women were in most cases under the authority of their father or husband, they had limited legal standing outside of the men in their family. A woman who committed adultery was stoned to death, and a woman who fornicated but pretended to be a virgin, likewise. In short, women were soundly controlled by general society, and prevented from acting up their primal instincts.”
HEY DONAL! JESUS CAME TO FULFILL THE LAW OF MOSES! NOT ONLY DOES GBFM TALK ABOUT THE LAW OF MOSES, BUT SO DOES JESUS! DO YOU THINK JESUS IS BAD AND WRONG BECAUSE OF THIS?
HAVE YOU EVER READ THE BIBLE?
http://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%205%3A17
Matthew 5:17 (KJ21) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Think not that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (ASV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I came to destroy the law or the prophets: I came not to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (AMP) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not think that I have come to do away with or undo the Law or the Prophets; I have come not to do away with or undo but to complete and fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (CEB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus and the Law
17 “Don’t even begin to think that I have come to do away with the Law and the Prophets. I haven’t come to do away with them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (CJB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Don’t think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete.
Matthew 5:17 (CEV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law of Moses
17 Don’t suppose that I came to do away with the Law and the Prophets. I did not come to do away with them, but to give them their full meaning.
Matthew 5:17 (DARBY) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I am come to make void the law or the prophets; I am not come to make void, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (DRA) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (ERV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus and the Old Testament Writings
17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy the Law of Moses or the teaching of the prophets. I have come not to destroy their teachings but to give full meaning to them.
Matthew 5:17 (ESV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ Came to Fulfill the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (ESVUK) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ Came to Fulfil the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them.
Matthew 5:17 (EXB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Importance of the Law and the Prophets
17 “Don’t think that I have come to ·destroy [abolish; do away with] ·the law of Moses or the teaching of the prophets [L the Law and the Prophets; C referring to the OT]. I have not come to destroy them but to ·bring about what they said [fulfill/complete them].
Matthew 5:17 (GNV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (GW) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside Moses’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
Matthew 5:17 (GNT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Teaching about the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with the Law of Moses and the teachings of the prophets. I have not come to do away with them, but to make their teachings come true.
Matthew 5:17 (HCSB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ Fulfills the Law
17 “Don’t assume that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17-20 (PHILLIPS) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ’s authority surpasses that of the Law
17-20 “You must not think I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to complete them. Indeed, I assure you that, while Heaven and earth last, the Law will not lose a single dot or comma until its purpose is complete. This means that whoever now relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men to do the same will himself be called least in Heaven. But whoever teaches and practises them will be called great in the kingdom of Heaven. For I tell you that your goodness must be a far better thing then the goodness of the scribes and Pharisees before you can set foot in the kingdom of Heaven at all!
Matthew 5:17 (JUB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 ¶ Think not that I am come to undo the law or the prophets; I am not come to undo, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (KJV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (AKJV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (LEB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Sermon on the Mount: The Law and the Prophets Fulfilled
17 “Do not think that I have come to destroy the law or the prophets. I have not come to destroy them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (TLB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come—it isn’t to cancel the laws of Moses and the warnings of the prophets. No, I came to fulfill them and to make them all come true.
Matthew 5:17-18 (MSG) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Completing God’s Law
17-18 “Don’t suppose for a minute that I have come to demolish the Scriptures—either God’s Law or the Prophets. I’m not here to demolish but to complete. I am going to put it all together, pull it all together in a vast panorama. God’s Law is more real and lasting than the stars in the sky and the ground at your feet. Long after stars burn out and earth wears out, God’s Law will be alive and working.
Matthew 5:17 (NOG) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside Moses’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
Matthew 5:17 (NASB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (NCV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Importance of the Law
17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy the law of Moses or the teaching of the prophets. I have not come to destroy them but to bring about what they said.
Matthew 5:17 (NET) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Fulfillment of the Law and Prophets
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have not come to abolish these things but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (NIRV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Gives Full Meaning to the Law
17 “Do not think I have come to get rid of what is written in the Law or in the Prophets. I have not come to do that. Instead, I have come to give full meaning to what is written.
Matthew 5:17 (NIV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Fulfillment of the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (NIVUK) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The fulfilment of the law
17 ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them.
Matthew 5:17 (NKJV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ Fulfills the Law
17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (NLV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Teaches about the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with the Law of Moses or the writings of the early preachers. I have not come to do away with them but to complete them.
Matthew 5:17 (NLT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Teaching about the Law
17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.
Matthew 5:17 (NRSV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (NRSVA) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (NRSVACE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (NRSVCE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.
Mattityahu 5:17 (OJB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not think that I came to abolish the Torah or the Neviim. I did not come to abolish but to complete.
Matthew 5:17 (RSV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 “Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them.
Matthew 5:17 (RSVCE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 “Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them.
Matthew 5:17 (VOICE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not think that I have come to overturn or do away with the law or the words of our prophets. To the contrary: I have not come to overturn them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (WEB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Don’t think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I didn’t come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (WE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 `Do not think that I have come to take away the law and the writings of the prophets. No, I have not come to take them away. But I have come to do what they say must be done.
Matthew 5:17 (WYC) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not ye deem, that I came to undo the law, or the prophets; I came not to undo the law, but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (YLT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 `Do not suppose that I came to throw down the law or the prophets — I did not come to throw down, but to fulfill;
http://donalgraeme.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/thoughts-on-marriage-and-game/
Jesus Christ Exalted the Law of Moses, not Dalrock / Vox Gamey Game. More Gamey Churchians Threaten to Ban and Censor the Words of Da GBGM for Quoting Jesus Christ and Honoring THE LAW OF MOSES Over Gamey Churchian Butt and Gina Tingalalozozzoozzo
Churchians have no shame and deserve every divorce/broken marriage they get. Their failed gamey crusade shall soon be forgotten, while the Christ and Moses they castigated, ignored, belittled, censored, and impugned shall Rise Again and Serve the Rising Generation who honors the Law of Moses and our Lord Jesus Christ over gamey game and gina tiznzgzlzlozozozo.
“Those who live by the tingzlzozozozozl shall die by the tingzlzlzozozlzoz” -GBFM
http://donalgraeme.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/thoughts-on-marriage-and-game/
donalgraeme writes, “IV. Conclusion
It cannot be denied that before the advent of Marriage 2.0, it wasn’t necessary for Christian men to have to Game their wives. Nor did they face an environment which was set up to ruin marriage as much as possible. Unfortunately, we do live in the Marriage 2.0 regime now, and Christian men must adapt to the times.”
Real Christian Men would Man Up and Exalt Christ and Moses, rather than Denying Their Teachings, just to serve tingzlzlzzo and kneel before a woman’s whims.
I wrote this response to you on Donal’s site. But I will post it here:
GBFM, the term “game” has been adopted by a number of Christians.
Why? Gamers have ‘success’ with women Christian men do not.
However, the lack of manliness/masculinity among Christian men is not due to a lack of game but a lack of proper Christianity, or a distorted Christianity, culture, single motherdom etc. they have bought into.
One would hope, having seen game, they would reject it and read the scriptures in a new light gaining sanity, sophroneo. They have not yet reached that stage. Hopefully they will soon.
Christians don’t go for “game”, but for Wisdom.
There are a lot of “Churchians” over there, G.B.F.M., you are right about that…